Court Grants Class Certification in suit against ConocoPhillips Co.

On October 27, 2011, the Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez granted plaintiffs' motion for class certification in a case brought by approximately six hundred Operators and Lab Workers who work at three ConocoPhillips petroleum refineries located in California. The workers, represented by Hadsell Stormer Richardson & Renick and Gilbert & Sackman, were required to work twelve hour shifts without being allowed to leave their units and subject to interruptions at any time, violating California's law against "on-duty" meal periods. Read the order here.

There were two classes certified: 1) all former, current, and future non-exempt hourly employees of Conoco who, at any time since February 15, 2004, worked as an operator on a shift schedule at a Conoco petroleum refinery located in Los Angeles, Santa Maria, or Rodeo, California; and 2) all former, current, and future non-exempt hourly employees of Conoco who, at any time since February 15, 2004, through June 8, 2009, worked in the laboratory on a shift schedule at a Conoco petroleum refinery located in Los Angeles, Santa Maria, or Rodeo, California.

Attorney Randy Renick notes that "the court's ruling affirms what the workers have known for some time, that a break isn't a break when the employee is required to keep working."

This decision follows an appeal of Judge Gutierrez' previous denial of class certification. Judge Gutierrez denied certification the first time around based on the possibility that plaintiffs would not prevail on their 'on duty' theory. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded, holding that a district court may not "decline to certify [a] class on the basis of a mere potentiality that may or may not be realized." United Steel Workers v. ConocoPhillips Co, 593 F.3d 802, 810 (9th Cir. 2010). Instead, a district court must consider whether "plaintiffs' actual legal theory" is one in which common issues of law or fact predominate over individual questions. Id. at 808.

Plaintiffs are represented by Randy Renick and Anne Richardson of Hadsell Stormer Richardson & Renick, LLP and Robert Cantore and Josh Young of Gilbert & Sackman. The case is United Steel Workers v. ConocoPhillips Co., CV 08-2068 PSG (FFMx).

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

Contact Us - Free Initial Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Pasadena Office
128 N. Fair Oaks Ave.
Suite 204
Pasadena, CA 91103

Toll Free: 866-457-2590
Phone: 626-585-9600
Fax: 626-577-7079
Map & Directions

Downtown Los Angeles Office (Legal Fund)
250 1st Street
Suite 1201
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Phone: 213-785-6999
Map & Directions