Disney Measure L Settlement – Click Here
Antitrust & Consumer Protection

Antitrust & Consumer Protection

  • Pinney v. Great Western Bank (United States District Court, Central District, Case No. CV 95-2110 IH).
    In a ground-breaking matter brought on behalf of a class of elderly bank customers, our attorneys obtained the largest settlement of its kind against Great Western for fraudulent sales practices of $16.2 million (1996).
  • In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation (MDL 7269).
    Antitrust class action on behalf of direct purchasers of LCD screens alleging a nationwide class for price-fixing. The case settled for more than $400,000,000 (2014).
  • In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory Antitrust Litigation (MDL 1486).
    Antitrust class action on behalf of consumers and business consumers of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM). The case settled for more than $330 million (2007).
  • In Re Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Litigation (MDL 1566).
    Settlements of over $150,000,000 in antitrust class action on behalf of California buyers of natural gas.
  • In Re Methionine Antitrust Litigation (MDL 1311).
    A nationwide class action on behalf of direct purchasers of methionine alleging price-fixing. The case was settled for $107,000,000 (2002).
  • In Re Compact Disc Cases (J.C.C.P. No. 4123).
    Antitrust class action on behalf of California consumers of prerecorded compact discs. Settled for more than $100,000,000.
  • In Re Smokeless Tobacco Cases I-IV (J.C.C.P. Nos. 4250, 4258, 4259 and 4262).
    Certified antitrust class action on behalf of California consumers of smokeless tobacco products. The case settled for $99,000,000 with over $25,000,000 allocated cy pres (2008).
  • Vitamin Cases (J.C.C.P. No. 4076).
    Antitrust class action on behalf of California consumers of vitamins. The case was settled for $96 million (2003).
  • In Re California Indirect Purchaser MSG Antitrust Cases (No. 304471).
    Antitrust class action on behalf of California indirect purchasers of monosodium glutamate. The case settled for more than $11,000,000 (2005).
  • In Re Urethane Cases (J.C.C.P. No. 4367).
    Settlements of over $9,000,000 in antitrust class action on behalf of all California indirect purchasers of urethane and urethane chemicals. Served as Co-Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs and investigated and vetted the 42 California organizations that were approved as recipients of the nearly $8 million allocated cy pres (2018).
  • In Re California Polychloroprene Cases (J.C.C.P. 4376–2006).
    Statewide class on behalf of indirect purchasers for polychloroprene. The matter settled in excess of $4.5 million, with more than $3 million contributed to California environmental groups (2006).
  • In Re Richard Villa et al. v. Crompton Corporation et al. (Consolidated Case No. CGC-03-419116).
    Settlements of over $2,000,000 antitrust class action on behalf of California indirect purchasers of EPDM (2011).

Contact Us Today

Call Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai LLP at (626) 775-7870 or fill out the form below.

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • Please enter a message.
  • Please enter a message.
  • Please enter a message.
  • We encourage you to provide us with a description of the facts concerning what happened to you with key dates and information. We ask that you not use AI to draft your submission or in connection with your intake submission, as your use of AI may be discoverable (subject to disclosure to other parties) in the event that you file a lawsuit. Legal claims and theories generated by AI also do little to assist us in evaluating your submission. Thank you.